VSDA ‘99 - Keynote panel |
|
|
|
||||||||||||
acclaimed German director Werner Herzog, whose masterpiece “Fitzcarraldo” is soon seeing a release on DVD. It was immediately obvious that these directors cover the whole palette of filmmakers working in and outside of Hollywood in different genres, on varying budgets, and with different levels of industry recognition. It set the stage for an interesting forum, indeed. |
|
|
|||||||||||||
Deleted scenes, isolated music scores and commentary tracks were only a few things, he believes are important and help him to complete the vision of his films as a whole. It allows him to literally compile material during the shoot for future use on DVD. Things that don’t work in the context of the movie can be used later. To an applauding audience, Ratner also admitted that he could not sit through a pan & scan presentation of a film and added a little anecdote. For one of his future films, Ratner is currently courting actor Nicolas Cage. When he went to visit the actor on the set of one of his films he noticed a pan & scan video tape of his film “Rush Hour” in Cage’s trailer. He immediately asked Cage to stay away from it and go for the DVD instead, offering to send him both, a DVD player and the disc, in case Cage didn’t own one. A this point of the keynote it became already very obvious that Brett Ratner is clearly one of the strongest proponents the DVD industry has in Hollywood’s filmmaking community and he would indeed back this perception up at a later point during the keynote. |
|
|
||||||||||||
enthusiastically. Herzog also feels that DVD in particular allows filmmakers to create more personal releases. The DVD release of “Fitazcarraldo”, just like his previous film “Nosferatu” will contain both, the original German version and the US version on one disc, thanks to Anchor Bay Entertainment’s efforts. In theatrical releases there are always studio politicking, marketing afterthoughts and PR requirements involved, which oftentimes restrict filmmakers to release what they would truly like people to see. Herzog clearly feels people should still experience films in theaters for the first time but DVD could then allow them to re-visit the experience and actually add layers of depth to that. He compared it to a concert. Most people go and see a show or theater performance and then buy a recording of it to be able to revisit the event, refreshing the memories, and he feels video can do the same things for films. |
|
|
|||||||||||||
that is finally seen by audiences. The bonus features on DVD allowed him and his team to make the process more tangible for viewers. So what is the studios’ attitude towards releasing material like deleted scenes? Do they support it or are they trying to hinder it, Maltin next asked and Robert Altman quickly pointed out that as the director “We have control. Nothing happens without our approval”. His biggest concern towards releasing deleted material and bloopers however is that he tries to protect his actors, and it quickly became obvious that he would never release material that would make his actors look bad or that could potentially discredit them. He admitted however that with some scenes he is perfectly happy to show. Sometimes scenes are not really bad, they just don’t work within the context of the film. To that extend, Brett Ratner was almost the opposite. He loves to bring bloopers and failed attempts and correctly pointed out that Jackie Chan actually made an art out of it. People love to see the end credits of his films because they are a riot. “If the actor breaks during a take, it is one of the rare occasions where you actually get to see the person” he pointed out. Since audiences usually just get to see the actor in his role, people love to see what the actors are really like. |
|
|
||||||||||||
not always allow for that, but on DVD once again, directors actually have the chance to go back and create the cut they originally envisioned. Bill Condon at this point also pointed out that DVD, through its non-linearity, allows you to do anything, including many things you cannot do in a movie, which is by nature completely linear. Studios actually use that as an argument he pointed out, soothing over politics by telling filmmakers that there will be an opportunity to do new cuts and other things for the video release, but not immediately for the theatrical release of a film. Directors can then add more of their vision to the product through additional material or deleted scenes. Leonard Maltin actually made a good point by mentioning that there’s usually a reason why the highly touted “never-before-seen footage” supplements have never been seen before, much to the amusement of the audience. So how do these filmmakers feel exactly about DVD personally? This was Bill Condon’s moment to speak up for the entire DVD community - and as he told me after the keynote, he did so because of a long discussion the two of us had on the issue a little while ago as part of our interview for “Gods And Monsters”. “DVD is great!” he said, “Especially the capabilities of16x9 enhancement.” The audience applauded Condon as he went on, explaining that studios need to support this particular feature of DVD and should not hold back anamorphic transfers for a re-release of the films 2 or 3 years later. Even for people watching anamorphic films on regular TV sets, anamorphic transfers have a number of benefits that are clearly visible. For the DVD release of “Gods And Monsters” Condon told the audience that indeed he went back and fixed up some of the shots that were slightly out of focus. While it did not matter on a projected theater screen, they didn’t really work on a TV display. |
|
|
|||||||||||||
spend a lot of time writing algorithms that would manipulate the images so that the film transfers would take on the look of the images on the computer monitors. They spend weeks doing that and according to Darnell it was a nightmare. In order to maintain that look of the film they decided to rather telecine the film than going for a direct digital-to-digital transfer the way Disney’s “A Bug’s Life” did. As a filmmaker, one of the worst things must be to watch your films mutilated and in shoddy pan & scan versions, Maltin assumed, asking the directors how they deal with this situation. Bill Condon and Robert Altman prefer to shoot on Super 35 film stock that gives them more freedom. Super 35 has the advantage that the entire 1.33:1 frame can be exposed and is later matted down to whatever aspect ratio the director wants the film to be seen in. The result is a so called ‘open matte; transfer on video that actually contains more image information than the original theatrical version of the film. It is a compromise both directors seem to be quite comfortable with. “I like widescreen”, Altman mentioned. “I like seeing people moving their heads left and right when watching a film” he added amusingly. Altman actually owns a 16x9 widescreen TV set and although the pixel aspect ratio is slightly distorted on these TV sets he still finds it quite comfortable. |
|
|
|||||||||||||
do a narrative feature film, instead of the documentaries he did of late. He is currently working on a project called “Invincible” for Fine Line, and is preparing “Kinski” his documentary on the late German character actor Klaus Kinski for release. With that the keynote closed and many of the directors spend a few moments, talking to some of the attendees personally until they were ushered out to make room for the next seminar. It was great to see how directors actually pay attention to DVD as a format, involving it in their work. Especially in the case of Brett Ratner and Bill Condon, it is obvious that the industry has found two spokespeople who can help giving the format additional leverage. |
© 1997-99 by “DVD Review”. All rights reserved. |
||