|
Still, one could argue that studios should give credit to those hardworking, underpaid individuals who spent long days and endless nights working on their Special Editions that ultimately make the studios a lot of money. But should they really? Think about it. DVD packaging typically includes only the movie’s theatrical billing block, which has been bickered about in length and detail by Hollywood’s entertainment lawyers representing their talent. It is a reflection of the key people responsible to create the film. Are DVD producers really responsible for any creative aspects of the movie to the point that it would justify a published credit? Is a DVD producer really more important to the project than, let’s say the second unit director who went uncredited in the billing block? As you can see, this is not a trivial matter and it is one of the reasons why studios have so far avoided the issue altogether. With the importance of DVD in today’s home video market, one could argue that DVD is an entity all of its own, of which the feature film is only one part. It is made up of many components, such as the menus, the feature film, the transitions, the bonus materials, and so forth. Isn’t the DVD producer giving the film a new life, in a way? As such, wouldn’t it legitimize crediting on those merits alone? Hardly so, I would think, because everyone in the entire process of producing a movie and releasing it on home video is playing an important role. From the cast and the director all the way to the marketing person supervising the creation of the theatrical trailer, all the way to the DVD producer and the home video division’s marketing department creating the packaging and sales materials. |
|