|
|
Life Of Brian |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
innuendo, but to smatter their intelligent absurdity right in your face. One of Monty Python’s most controversial films was, without a doubt, “Life Of Brian”, a film that makes fun of the root of Christianity itself, and turns a dim-witted nobody in the Messiah during the times of Christian birth. |
On the night of Christ’s birth in Judea, in a stable next door, another boy is born by the name of Brian (Graham Chapman). Immediately after his birth the three holy man mistake him with Christ and offer their presents, only to take them away from the furious mother minutes later when they detect the real Messiah. Brian grows up a dim-witted peasant, but for some reason his life is crossing the path of Messiah over and over again, until one day the people of Judea actually mistake him for the Messiah once again and follow his very footsteps. |
|
|
||||||||||||
One of the interesting things about Monty Python’s films is that usually you can watch them over and over and over again, and every time you will detect something new. Something you missed in all previous viewings. Usually these are not elaborate details |
|
|
|||||||||||
work. On the surface it is just a joke that the centurion doesn’t catch the fact that Brian is actually agitating against him, and it is funny at that. If you dig deeper however you find that the way he lectures Brian is exactly the way Latin scholars are trained in school. In order to learn the Latin language it is essential to be able to completely reiterate all forms, declinations and conjugations of all verbs, adverbs and nouns of the language. This is no easy task because of the irregularity of these words and |
|
|
|||||||||||||||
overall image quality is well above par. The transfer appears a bit soft at times, but is generally well defined. It looks best in the interior scenes where the image boasts with solid blacks and strong colors. This is peculiar and indicates that the film print used is responsible for the grainy quality of the opening shots and some of the other outdoor sequences that appear grainy. Color reproduction of this release is generally good with absolutely faithfully rendered fleshtones and generally strong hues. Very slight compression artifacts are evident in a few scenes, and although dust and dirt are noticeable throughout the film, it never gets to the point that it is becoming distracting. |
|
|
|||||||||
© 1997-99 by “DVD Review”. All rights reserved. |
||